In January 2025, The Beatles won a Grammy for "Now and Then" — a song that used AI to resurrect John Lennon's voice from a decades-old cassette tape. A few weeks later, Kanye West confirmed he's using AI to produce his new album. And the Recording Academy's CEO went on record saying AI use alone won't disqualify a submission.
So where does that leave you — someone making tracks with Suno or Udio on a Saturday night? Could your AI-generated music ever win a Grammy? The answer is more interesting than you'd think.
THE OFFICIAL GRAMMY RULES ON AI
The Recording Academy's position, updated for the 2026 awards season, can be summarized in one sentence: AI can be a tool, but not the artist.
Their rules state that a work containing "no human authorship" is not eligible in any category. However — and this is the key part — using AI as part of your creative process does not automatically disqualify you. As CEO Harvey Mason Jr. put it in late 2025: AI use in music production "does not make your entry ineligible."
This creates two clear categories:
Eligible: A human writes lyrics, uses AI to generate a backing track, then arranges and produces the final mix. The human creative decisions drive the work.
Not eligible: Someone types "make a pop hit" into Suno and submits the raw output. No meaningful human authorship = no Grammy consideration.
The gray area is enormous, and the Academy knows it. Mason has called this "the toughest part of my job." Where exactly does AI assistance end and AI authorship begin? Nobody has a definitive answer yet.
THE BEATLES PRECEDENT: AI ALREADY WON A GRAMMY
When "Now and Then" won Best Rock Performance at the 2025 Grammys, it set a precedent that will echo for years. The song was originally recorded by John Lennon in the late 1970s, but the audio quality was too poor to use. Previous attempts by Paul McCartney and others in the 1990s failed.
It was Peter Jackson's team — the same people behind the "Get Back" documentary — who developed machine learning technology to isolate and clean Lennon's vocals from background noise. McCartney and Ringo Starr then completed the song with new instrumentation.
The critical distinction: AI didn't generate new music. It restored existing human-created material. The creative decisions — arrangement, production, additional instrumentation — were all made by humans. This is exactly the type of AI use the Academy considers legitimate.
KANYE, GHOSTWRITER, AND THE SHIFTING LINE
While The Beatles case was relatively clear-cut, other examples push into murkier territory.
Kanye West openly confirmed using AI in his upcoming album "Bully," comparing the technology to Auto-Tune — once controversial, now standard. His argument: AI is just another tool, and the creative vision remains human. If West submits AI-assisted tracks to the Grammys, it will be one of the biggest tests of the Academy's policy.
Ghostwriter's "Heart on My Sleeve" used AI to clone Drake and The Weeknd's voices without permission. The Grammy CEO said it was "absolutely eligible" in songwriting categories (since a human wrote it) but ineligible for performance categories (since the vocals weren't authorized). The song was ultimately pulled from streaming platforms.
These cases illustrate the spectrum the industry is grappling with — from legitimate AI-assisted production to unauthorized voice cloning.
A TIMELINE OF AI IN MUSIC AWARDS
WHAT ABOUT SPOTIFY AND STREAMING?
Even if you're not aiming for a Grammy, the streaming landscape matters. By late 2025, Deezer estimated that roughly 50,000 fully AI-generated songs were being uploaded to their platform every single day. This flood has forced every major platform to respond.
Spotify has removed tens of thousands of AI-generated tracks suspected of streaming fraud and is developing tools to label AI content. Bandcamp now explicitly bans music "generated wholly or in substantial part by AI." iHeartRadio pledged not to play AI music featuring synthetic vocalists pretending to be human artists.
The trend is clear: platforms want transparency, not a ban. Label your music honestly and you're fine. Try to pass AI music off as human-made and you risk being removed.
SO... CAN YOUR SUNO TRACK WIN A GRAMMY?
THE HONEST ANSWER
A track generated purely by typing a prompt into Suno or Udio? No. Not under current rules. The Recording Academy requires meaningful human authorship, and pressing "generate" doesn't qualify.
But a track where you wrote the lyrics, used AI to generate melodic ideas, then arranged, edited, layered, and produced the final version with genuine creative intent? Technically, yes. That level of human involvement could satisfy the Academy's requirements.
Will it actually happen anytime soon? Prediction markets currently give AI music about a 32% chance of winning a major music award by end of 2026. It's not impossible — but we're probably a few years away from an AI-assisted track standing on that stage.
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR AI MUSIC CREATORS
Whether or not you're dreaming of a Grammy, the direction is clear:
The more human creativity you add, the stronger your position. This applies to copyright, streaming eligibility, commercial use, and awards consideration. Think of AI as a collaborator, not a replacement. Write your own lyrics. Make creative decisions about arrangement and production. Use AI to expand your abilities, not to skip the creative process entirely.
Transparency wins. The industry is punishing deception and rewarding honesty. Label your music as AI-assisted. Don't clone voices. Don't pretend your AI track was made in a traditional studio. The creators who build trust now will be best positioned as the rules solidify.
The best AI music is a collaboration. The Beatles' Grammy-winning track succeeded because AI solved a technical problem that humans couldn't — isolating vocals from noise. Kanye is using AI to push creative boundaries, not to avoid doing the work. The most exciting AI music comes from creators who use the technology to do things that weren't possible before, not to automate what already exists.
The Grammy question is really a proxy for a bigger one: what role does AI play in human creativity? The answer, increasingly, is "whatever role the human decides to give it." And that's exactly how it should be.
CREATE, SHARE, GET RATED
Whether your music is Grammy-bound or just for fun — submit your AI tracks to VoteMyAI and see how the community rates them. 50+ tracks across 20+ genres, all community-rated.
Submit Your Track